The rot in Malaysia’s judicial system is pervasive and extends to the highest offices of power, both past and present. And now there is a videotape that many Malaysians — including many in the local bar — believe to be proof.
Last month, I released a videotaped recording showing a prominent local attorney, V.K. Lingam, discussing the appointment of top judges to the federal court. The person on the other end of the line appeared to be none other than Malaysia’s top judge, Ahmed Fairuz. The substance of the conversation leaves little doubt that what transpired was influence peddling and fixing of judicial appointments.
…
In the video, which was recorded in 2002, Mr. Lingam is seen and heard describing conversations and meetings the purpose of which were to gain influence with then-Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed to make favorable judicial appointments. The substance of his legal work, boasts Mr. Lingam, would be meaningless unless he did his part in securing friendly judges who would rule in favor of his clients. On the tape, Mr. Lingam remarked that “. . . half the time we are talking about judiciary rather than doing the work. But if I don’t do this part, my work will be useless.”
For Mr. Lingam, this kind of lobbying is par for the course. In 1994, for example, he enjoyed a lavish vacation in New Zealand with another chief justice, Tun Eusoff Chin, allegations that Mr. Lingam denied until photographic evidence and copies of travel itineraries from an insurance investigation put the two families on the same flight and at the same tourist destinations.
The contents of the video came as no surprise to many Malaysians, who recall Dr. Mahathir’s orchestrated efforts to emasculate the judiciary in 1988. At that time, Dr. Mahathir’s sacking of Tun Salleh Abbas, the then-chief judge, and other senior judges, left me deeply concerned about the breakdown of constitutional checks and balance inherent in our parliamentary democracy. Dr. Mahathir’s handpicked judges signaled the beginning of an era when the judiciary became enslaved to the executive branch. Since then, the executive has given short shrift to matters of accountability, governance and transparency in the judiciary.
…
After the video was released the government established a three-member panel with virtually no powers of investigation to probe the authenticity of the videotape. Three weeks after this panel began its work, it has produced no results and seems to have no mandate to look into the questions of corruption that the videotape raises. Meanwhile, the federal Anti Corruption Agency has threatened to arrest two individuals who helped bring the tape to light unless they divulge the identity of their source, and recent comments made by the head of the agency suggest a similar ultimatum may soon be issued against me. Such measures do not inspire confidence.
…
Yet the government’s response has been uninspiring. Prime Minister Badawi came to power in 2003 promising to clean up corruption and depoliticize the judiciary. His lack of action since the video’s release demonstrates how little he has accomplished on both fronts. He has rejected demands to establish the Royal Commission and instead has spent more than a month calling for verification of the authenticity of the video — a task that requires no more than a few hours of laboratory work.
Meanwhile, Cabinet members, some of them implicated in the videotape, have issued statements to the media telling them to report “responsibly” on the issue. “On this earth, we can do whatever we like, but you must remember that when you die, you have to answer to someone,” Tengku Adnan, minister for tourism, told reporters. His name is mentioned in the tape no less than 10 times as someone who could facilitate meetings with the prime minister to discuss judicial appointments. The two men best able to explain the tape, Mr. Lingam and Mr. Fairuz, have remained silent, apparently hoping that a combination of public apathy and the absence of an independent media will soon kill the story.
Sadly, none of this should be surprising to those who do business in Malaysia. Multinational corporations operating in the country often seek redress of their grievances in overseas courts in Singapore or Hong Kong rather than take their chances with the Malaysian judicial system. Other potential investors opt to steer clear of Malaysia altogether, planting themselves in neighboring countries that offer greater transparency, accountability and assurance of the rule of law. As the late Tun Suffian, a former chief judge with an impeccable record, once remarked in a speech in 2000, “When I am asked what I thought, my usual reply is that I wouldn’t like to be tried by today’s judges, especially if I am innocent.”
A government so complicit in the abuse of power and the destruction of the judiciary can hardly be expected to follow through on the structural reforms that are now required — namely, a complete overhaul of the process of judicial appointments, including the creation of an independent council with oversight powers and autonomy. The executive must be kept out of this process. The Conference of Rulers, a council comprising the nine rulers of the Malay states, must assert its authority and play its constitutional role as the people’s guardian against arbitrary action of the powers that be.
In this regard, the observation of Sultan Azlan Shah — the chief judge of the high court before his ascension to the rotating Malaysian throne — bears repetition: “The erosion of public confidence in the judiciary’s independence would ultimately lead to instability and it would certainly take a long time and would be an arduous task to restore it.”
Source: Wall Street Journal
Read:
Rare gems in Malaysia’s rotten judiciary
Malaysia’s judiciary exposed again, via a video-clip
Malaysia’s judiciary needs comprehensive cleaning up
Malaysia’s judiciary needs comprehensive cleaning up
Badawi tells Ahmad Fairuz to explain Federal Court judge who has not submitted 35 written judgments
Rot and More Rot in Malaysia’s Judicial System
Law and order in Malaysia ?
Malaysia is already tackling issues that many other countries are only just facing and its education system is on a good platform, said Education Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein. 
…But Selangor Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Dr. Mohammad Khir Toyo beat us to this. Last Friday, with an entourage in tow, he was at the jetty in Port Klang, inspecting the ferries.
According to the same newspaper, he was accompanied by “Port Klang state assemblyman Datuk Zakaria Md Deros! The country’s most infamous law breaker is out trying to catch other law-breakers! What if the ferry operator had turned around and asked the Mentri Besar: “Dia bina istana tanpa kelulusan boleh, tapi kami tak cukup life jacket pun mau kacau!”
MONEY would be better spent sending students to the United States to study space science instead of sending a second Angkasawan into space, said Nanyang Siang Pau in its editorial.
An analysis of Hishammuddin’s Education Blueprint